Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 12, 2020

Created

Tue Nov 26 00:36:24 +0000 2019

Likes

588

Retweets

107

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

1/ From Day 1, what I and other lawyers objected to was federal witnesses showing up and asserting executive privilege *without a prior White House assertion*. That's outrageous. But when Trump started blocking *all* testimony? Well, we *all* knew that wouldn't hold up in court. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 26, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

I'm not getting too worked up about tonight's decision because: 1. It'll be appealed. 2. It was expected ("absolute immunity" doesn't exist). 3. Witnesses can still show up and assert privilege. The *real* question is if a witness can assert privilege *without* a WH assertion. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 26, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

2/ The real matter of import in tonight's federal district court decision is the timing: is it *possible* that it happened quickly enough that a SCOTUS appeal could be heard by mid- to late January? Hmm. Realistically? If McGahn wants to run out the clock, he probably still can. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 26, 2019 Hibernated