{"id": 883365582560784389, "lang": "en", "text": "RT @CaucusOnClimate: How good are scientific models at predicting future warming? \n\nIt turns out: better than we thought. https://t.co/wzKM\u2026", "urls": [], "user": {"id": 2962868158}, "id_str": "883365582560784389", "source": "<a href=\"https://about.twitter.com/products/tweetdeck\" rel=\"nofollow\">TweetDeck</a>", "deleted": false, "hashtags": [], "retrieved": "2017-12-06--11-37-27", "created_at": "Fri Jul 07 16:42:21 +0000 2017", "retweet_count": 14, "user_mentions": [{"id": 2792540601, "name": "Safe Climate Caucus", "screen_name": "CaucusOnClimate"}], "legacy_imported": true, "retweeted_status": {"id": 883365378650513408, "lang": "en", "text": "How good are scientific models at predicting future warming? \n\nIt turns out: better than we thought. https://t.co/wzKMnnGQFn", "urls": [{"url": "https://t.co/wzKMnnGQFn", "expanded_url": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/07/05/scientists-are-starting-to-clear-up-one-of-the-biggest-controversies-in-climate-science/?utm_term=.4edaae5175e5"}], "user": {"id": 2792540601}, "id_str": "883365378650513408", "source": "<a href=\"https://about.twitter.com/products/tweetdeck\" rel=\"nofollow\">TweetDeck</a>", "hashtags": [], "created_at": "Fri Jul 07 16:41:33 +0000 2017", "retweet_count": 14, "user_mentions": [], "favorite_count": 15}}