Joanna Rutkowska

@rootkovska ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 3, 2023

Created

Mon Jul 15 18:00:12 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Joanna Rutkowska @rootkovska

(9/12) Now we could move on and have largely automated ways of resolving disputes between two persons. The resolver would take as input descriptors of the 2 debators, plus the statement being discussed (“should abortion be legal?”, “should gays adoption rights?”)... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 15, 2019

Preceded By

Joanna Rutkowska @rootkovska

(8/12) Such ethical descriptors would likely comprise many tens of properties, producing very large space of possible ethical systems. By convention some constellations in this space might be labeled as e.g. “communism”, “western liberalism”, etc. This would be optional, however. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 15, 2019

Followed By

Joanna Rutkowska @rootkovska

(10/12) The resolver will likely *not* return a ready answer, but rather pinpoint the actual property(ies) responsible for lack of agreement. In case of the “abortion” question above, this might perhaps be the property: “mind.cartesian_ego”, possibly other properties. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 15, 2019