Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 18, 2021

Created

Wed Dec 16 03:08:40 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

What Section 230 reform *would do* is bring much needed clarity to the terms contained in the statutory text. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

Similarly, the claim that Section 230 reform would resurrect the Fairness Doctrine or mandate neutrality misses the mark. The Petition is quite clear on this: It would not require any website to carry “any sort of content at all.” https://t.co/jGmubG8aLs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

In other words, the question presented by the Section 230 Petition is not whether the First Amendment will continue to cover a take down decision (it will) but whether a particular take down *also* benefits from Section 230’s statutory protections. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020