Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 17, 2021

Created

Wed Dec 16 03:08:39 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

For instance, they argue that action on the Section 230 Petition would force websites to carry speech in violation of their First Amendment rights. Not at all. NTIA’s Petition expressly says that websites would retain their 1st Amendment right to remove content “for any reason.” https://t.co/c49VAhYfD0 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

The debate over Section 230 often produces more heat than light. One reason: Big Tech’s lobbyists routinely conflate statutory protections with First Amendment rights. 🧵 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

Similarly, the claim that Section 230 reform would resurrect the Fairness Doctrine or mandate neutrality misses the mark. The Petition is quite clear on this: It would not require any website to carry “any sort of content at all.” https://t.co/jGmubG8aLs — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020