Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 24, 2021

Created

Thu Oct 29 01:52:48 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@jess_miers @riScorpian @digiphile Bringing definitional clarity to the terms Congress included (or the lines it drew) doesn’t need to create the type of rigid or static outcome you raise, particularly given that we’re talking (as I view it) about the 230(c)(2) take down provision. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 29, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@jess_miers @riScorpian @digiphile I think Congress made the decision in Section 230 to draw lines (for instance, it drew one between good faith and bad faith take downs) I think courts have erred by essentially eliminating those lines or not applying them by not reaching (c)(2). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 29, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@jess_miers @riScorpian @digiphile Even with a “narrower” conception of (c)(2), you can still take speech down by relying on your 1A rights. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 29, 2020