Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 26, 2020

Created

Wed Jul 08 01:06:24 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@burro_rabia @mmasnick Rage Donkey, if your argument is that 230 does no more than codify First Amendment law, then you should have no objection to reforming or revoking 230 because doing so would, in your view, not change the legal status quo - those 1A protections would live on. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@AtlantaLiberal @mmasnick Some have the view that 230 was a deal — act like a platform (and get 230 protections) or act like a publisher (and don’t). That view isn’t right. 230’s text basically eliminates the platform - publisher distinction and says, in (c)(2), good faith conduct gets 230 protections. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@mmasnick By “all others” I mean all other speakers, not just websites. I think we’re agreeing that 230 can be reformed w/o violating 1A, and I’ve offered ideas that I believe would do just that, including more clarity around the “good faith” language that Congress included in 230. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020