Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 25, 2020

Created

Tue Jul 07 23:05:12 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

Indeed, Justice Breyer’s main point — that free speech must give way to the democratically expressed views of the people — rejects the very point of the First Amendment, which is to protect the minority from the majority. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 7, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

The idea that the government (or a majority acting through it) can judge some speech as more valuable or deserving of First Amendment protections than other speech is not, as Breyer suggests, enshrined in the First Amendment, it is rejected by it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 7, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@mmasnick Big if true! Of course, it’s not. I have not said that a website should lose First Amendment protections. You’re conflating Section 230 with the First Amendment. There is no First Amendment right to Section 230. So Section 230 can be reformed without infringing any 1A rights. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020