Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 29, 2020

Created

Wed Jun 17 16:09:40 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

One of the main purposes of Section 230 is to encourage social media companies to give users the tools to make their own decisions and control their own feeds. That has been lost in the recent debate, which has focused on the decisions Big Tech now makes for us. https://t.co/UCEmWYnP9d — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

Facebook’s new approach lets every citizen make that choice. If you don’t want to see a political ad, you can opt out. This is unacceptable to those “engaged citizens” b/c they don’t accept a diversity of views: everyone must agree with their views on “harmful” political ads. — PolitiTweet.org

Not about making up your mind on the candidate or being sick of the election. Many engaged citizens just want FB to… https://t.co/euIZ8odlwZ

Posted June 17, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

Returning more power and control to consumers will be an important feature of Section 230 reforms IMO For instance, there’d be a stronger case for maintaining Section 230’s unique protections if Big Tech empowered consumers to opt out of their biased moderation choices. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020