Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 22, 2022

Created

Wed Oct 30 20:31:19 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

The op-ed also laments that the First Amendment protects “good guys” and “bad actors” alike. But that’s a feature, not a bug. I don’t want the government deciding what speech is “good” versus “bad.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

This op-ed gets the First Amendment backwards. It would give the government and politicians license to shut down ideas and silence groups they don’t like. Indeed, speech seeking political, social, or economic change is often labeled as “hateful” by those in power. — PolitiTweet.org

My @WashingtonPost piece on why the very broadness of the First Amendment suggests we should have a hate speech law… https://t.co/FO6fb8YyNq

Posted Oct. 30, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

The op-ed claims that the First Amendment protects only a narrow and limited set of values, and thus we should tolerate new intrusions on free speech. Not so. As SCOTUS has said, the First Amendment expresses a commitment to “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” debate. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2019 Hibernated