Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 22, 2022

Created

Fri Jun 07 15:21:32 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

First Amendment law certainly tolerates some degree of interference with free speech rights where appropriately tailored to further a sufficient government interest - indeed, many FCC rules do just that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 7, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

As the Supreme Court made clear in PG&E, the First Amendment right to receive information is one that protects us from the government censoring private speech. It does not operate as a sword, empowering the government to intrude upon that speech. https://t.co/9lUeGti1Ew — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 7, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

But that is very different than invoking the First Amendment itself as a sword or source of authority for the government to infringe on free speech or “level the playing field” of ideas. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 7, 2019 Hibernated