Ida Bae Wells

@nhannahjones ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 8, 2023

Created

Thu Feb 23 18:31:37 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones

@MFDoomStanLee @DouglasKMurray He says that the 1619 Project co-authors would not debate "actual historians," which anyone with a basic understanding of language knows is an implication that the co-authors are not historians -- hence the use of the modifier "actual." You're welcome. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Preceded By

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones

The easiest tell that a critic has not read a single page of the 1619 Project, not even the table of contents, is when they say what "real" historians would say about the project, as if eight of the chapters are not written by academic historians. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Followed By

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones

@MFDoomStanLee @DouglasKMurray Then you're refusing to read what he actually wrote -- it's right there, he said the 1619 Project co-authors refuse to debate actual historians -- and instead subbing out for the meaning you want because it confirms the way you want to feel. Either way, I'm finished here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023