Tweet by @nhannahjones

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones

No, AP African American Studies is not the 1619 Project, but can't help but take as an unnecessary slight this juxtaposing the 1619 Project -- written largely by academic historians --against something that is "mainstream, rigorously vetted." Further, an AP AFAM might reach 1619. — PolitiTweet.org

“AP African American Studies is not CRT. It’s not the 1619 Project. It is a mainstream, rigorously vetted, academic… https://t.co/KxGgvR86ld

Posted Aug. 23, 2022 Deleted after 21 minutes

Preceded By

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones

RT @KeishaBlain: “AP African American Studies is not CRT. It’s not the 1619 Project. It is a mainstream, rigorously vetted, academic approa… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 23, 2022 Retweet Deleted after 8 seconds

Followed By

Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones

The 1619 Project has works written by @marthasjones_ at Johns Hopkins, @TiyaMilesTAM and @KhalilGMuhammad at Harvard, @ProfCAnderson at Emory, Kevin Kruse at Princeton, @DorothyERoberts and @AntheaButler at Penn, @lesliemalex AZ, @DrIbram at BU. So, again, why say this. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 23, 2022 Deleted after 17 minutes