James Hohmann

@jameshohmann ↗

Deleted Yes

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 19, 2022

Created

Wed May 13 00:03:38 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Unavailable

James Hohmann @jameshohmann

In an evidentiary hearing, Judge Sullivan could call witnesses, such as Flynn, his investigators or even prosecutors, to obtain more facts about how the case was handled and why Flynn and agents took the steps they did. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 13, 2020 Deleted after 2 years Hibernated

Preceded By

James Hohmann @jameshohmann

Judge Sullivan’s invitation could set the stage for an adversarial proceedings in which one or more attorneys argue against the Justice Department. It would also permit, if the judge chooses, to require sides to produce evidence and revisit the case for and against Michael Flynn. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 13, 2020 Deleted after 2 years Hibernated

Followed By

James Hohmann @jameshohmann

Sullivan has not hesitated to personally question Flynn in court before, as he did during an abortive 2018 sentencing hearing, when he rejected a defense motion supported by the government for probation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 13, 2020 Deleted after 2 years Hibernated