jeremy scahill

@jeremyscahill ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 12, 2020

Created

Sun Apr 12 18:29:01 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@ijbailey @ggreenwald They did separate them into two sentences in the original and did not equate them. The first sentence was about sexual assault allegations. The second was about OTHER sexual misconduct allegations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 12, 2020

Preceded By

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@ijbailey @ggreenwald Those were two separate assertions. The first deals with sexual assault. The second deals with other allegations of misconduct. The original text accurately said the NYT found none beyond the misconduct allegations that that have been made public. The edit removes that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 12, 2020

Followed By

jeremy scahill @jeremyscahill

@ijbailey @ggreenwald Beyond, as in, *no others in addition to the many already made in public of Biden’s alleged misconduct.* I don’t understand what your point is. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 12, 2020