Glenn Kessler

@GlennKesslerWP ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 27, 2022

Created

Fri Feb 11 15:26:57 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Glenn Kessler @GlennKesslerWP

The flack might have come back with a “yes.” Big story! Or maybe, when the flack checked with legal, the agency staff would have said, holy shit, the WFB is asking about pipes and they would have said no. Not quite as good a story but the logical follow-up question would be… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Glenn Kessler @GlennKesslerWP

The reporter got an on-the-record statement from an agency spox that danced around the question of whether grants would be given for safe smoking kits that include crack pipes. The next logical step was to specifically ask if pipes were included…. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Glenn Kessler @GlennKesslerWP

What’s the point of a safe smoking kit without pipes? I quote the Drug Policy Initiative as saying they expected pipes to be funded, so the story could have been about $ spent on a nonsensical policy. But instead the WFB assumed the kits included pipes… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2022 Hibernated