Daniel Dale

@ddale8 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 13, 2020

Created

Thu Feb 20 05:59:03 +0000 2020

Likes

331

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Daniel Dale @ddale8

Totally possible fear of a future monitor was one reason stops fell. Regardless, Biden's claim is that Obama sent monitors and told New York to cut it out and then things changed. Obama didn't send the monitor, and stops fell pre-monitor. https://t.co/i0YFSujVnN — PolitiTweet.org

@ddale8 But why did they plummet? There was now the likelihood of the monitor, no?

Posted Feb. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

Biden is wrong to suggest that the independent monitor was the reason stop and frisk was curtailed. Because Bloomberg appealed the August 2013 ruling, the monitor didn't really get to work until November 2014. By then, the number of stops had already plummeted. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

@JeffreyLax It's a semi-mystery. What Bloomberg and his police commish announced was an increase in internal oversight and additional training on doing proper stops. Then, without a formal policy change, and with Bloomberg still vocally advocating stop-frisk, the number of stops plummeted. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 20, 2020 Hibernated