Daniel Dale

@ddale8 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 26, 2020

Created

Wed Jan 22 17:38:21 +0000 2020

Likes

3,155

Retweets

831

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Daniel Dale @ddale8

In addition to these three false claims, a Trump lawyer also suggested -- in language too confusing for me to call the claim false, so I went with misleading -- that Mueller's report concluded that there was "no obstruction." It explicitly did not come to that conclusion. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 22, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

No, Republicans weren't banned from the SCIF. No, Trump's lawyer wasn't banned from Judiciary. No, Democrats didn't take "33 days" to transmit the articles. My fact check of false claims Trump's lawyers made yesterday on the Senate floor: https://t.co/Fer7rfLcWE — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 22, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

Trump lawyer also said "there was no quid pro quo for anything," since "security assistance funds aren't even mentioned on the call." Zelensky mentioned Javelins -- which weren't part of this batch of funds but are still key for Ukraine. Trump responded by asking for the "favor." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 22, 2020 Hibernated