Daniel Dale

@ddale8 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 30, 2020

Created

Tue Aug 20 00:27:40 +0000 2019

Likes

1,102

Retweets

220

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Daniel Dale @ddale8

My article describes the study’s methodology and criticisms of it. Notably: 1) Google’s algorithm favoring a deep NYT investigation of Trump over a Breitbart puff piece would be seen as bias. 2) There’s no proof at all of a link between any Google bias and 2016 voting behavior. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

A couple problems with Trump’s tweet about Google and 2016 votes being “manipulated”: 1) He’s wrongly describing a study, which doesn’t allege manipulation of anything including votes. 2) The study itself has major flaws. My fact check: https://t.co/Y0PzdgELeh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

The study had random people rate Google results for bias. Then, extrapolating from the author’s work in other countries, it estimated how many 2016 votes could potentially be affected by such bias. No US voter was tested to see how their views had actually been changed by search. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 20, 2019 Hibernated