Daniel Dale

@ddale8 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 7, 2020

Created

Wed Jul 31 01:39:39 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Daniel Dale @ddale8

@rich29uk For sure, lots — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 31, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

I talked to both the IPCC itself and a senior IPCC emissions person. They say that isn't what the report says. They only picked 2030 to study because countries had set Paris Accord goals for 2030. There's no scientific significance to 2030, they told me. https://t.co/Y6YnJbs39w — PolitiTweet.org

@ddale8 Are you sure, i thought the IPCC report did say 2030 was the point of no return?

Posted July 31, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Daniel Dale @ddale8

One notable thing about checking the Democrats, as opposed to Trump, is that the statistics they cite are overwhelmingly either accurate or at least rooted in an actual source. With Trump, you have to be suspicious that almost everything is invented. https://t.co/hUOfs8emJh — PolitiTweet.org

As with the first Democratic debate last time around, a highly factual debate so far. (I don't check opinion and pr… https://t.co/rLMy5fUi76

Posted July 31, 2019 Hibernated