David Gauke

@DavidGauke ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 31, 2020

Created

Thu Dec 10 09:46:59 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Gauke @DavidGauke

@iainmartin1 @SirJJQC In this case, the benefit is zero tariffs/quotas. The cost? At some point in the future we may be in the position in certain circumstances where we are left with a choice between changing our regulations or losing that benefit. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 10, 2020

Preceded By

David Gauke @DavidGauke

@iainmartin1 @SirJJQC The way the sovereignty argument is sometimes expressed, we could never enter into any international agreement. Surely the point is that any treaty is a transaction with costs & benefits. And a sovereign nation chooses whether or not to enter into the transaction. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 10, 2020

Followed By

David Gauke @DavidGauke

@iainmartin1 @SirJJQC But if the position is we have a choice - change our regulations to align with EU or have quotas/tariffs - that’s still a choice for UK politicians accountable to the British people. That might not be a great choice & we’d like a choice of ‘neither’ but maybe that’s not possible. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 10, 2020