David Gauke

@DavidGauke ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 12, 2020

Created

Tue Nov 24 11:18:08 +0000 2020

Likes

114

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Gauke @DavidGauke

The arguments for no deal are deeply flawed. In this case, the first argument is that EU exporters to the UK would pay more in tariffs than the other way round. This would 'rebalance' our trading relationship & give us £8bn to provide grants to our exporters, it is suggested. /2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020

Preceded By

David Gauke @DavidGauke

There is another bout of optimism in the Brexit talks. A deal may well be reached. But it is worth noting that if Boris Johnson makes the compromises necessary to get a deal, he's taking a political risk - there will plenty of people who will cry betrayal. Here's one example. /1 — PolitiTweet.org

Project Fear, perpetrated by swathes of the establishment, including @DavidGauke in @ConHome, spin the yarn no-deal… https://t.co/C0NBDc2LJC

Posted Nov. 24, 2020

Followed By

David Gauke @DavidGauke

This is 'exports good/imports bad' mercantilist nonsense. And who would pay the tariffs? UK consumers. As for providing grants to compensate our exporters, that is contrary to WTO rules. So much for Brexit being about free trade. /3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020