Joe Scarborough

@JoeNBC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 28, 2022

Created

Tue Jun 07 22:54:44 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Joe Scarborough @JoeNBC

@marcthiessen I wouldn’t call it “really dangerous”. It would allow elections to have consequences and let winning majorities actually pass legislation. The constitutional check of a 6 year term provides the check framers drafted. Today, endless gridlock seems there greater danger. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 7, 2022

Preceded By

Joe Scarborough @JoeNBC

@marcthiessen Marc, I have always agreed with your position here. I loved the concept of a Senate that “cooled down” the House. But political sclerosis has set in. Large majorities are ignored. The 60 vote threshold no longer works. It was 67. How about 55? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 7, 2022

Followed By

Joe Scarborough @JoeNBC

@marcthiessen I’m curious what your thought is on moving the number to 55 instead of 60. In 1975, the Senate changed the number from 67 to 60 because “the chamber was becoming paralyzed”. It is again and will be still if Republicans take control because of the current political environment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 7, 2022