McKay Coppins @mckaycoppins
Seems more likely that it's because most of his critics *liked* the original version of Vance—his book was beloved in DC circa 2016-2017—and never had much affection for Club for Growth. (If you narrow the point to a specific swath of conservative critics, it's more defensible.) — PolitiTweet.org
Michael Brendan Dougherty @michaelbd
One of the reasons you can tell the agony in DC about Vance is primarily about policy (immigration and foreign poli… https://t.co/bctHasAtWm
