Pete Seat

@PeteSeat ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 3, 2023

Created

Tue Feb 23 14:26:44 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Pete Seat @PeteSeat

All this makes my point in the final sentence of the 6th paragraph ever more clear: Here, gerrymandering is not in the eye of the beholder, but in the eye of the loser. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2021

Preceded By

Pete Seat @PeteSeat

But no one (at least in what I’ve seen) could refute the factual evidence cited in the column related to geography (Americans gerrymandering themselves + migration to factory towns in the 30s). Instead, the detractors were basing their view in partisanship. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2021

Followed By

Pete Seat @PeteSeat

Why else would fact-deprived commenters call me a "fool” and a “DC GOP nerd lobbyist” (GOP nerd, sure, but not the other two) if not for their lack of evidence to refute the independently verified third-party sources used to make my point? Your Honor, I rest my case. Good day. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2021