Harmeet K. Dhillon

@pnjaban ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 14, 2022

Created

Fri Sep 09 03:40:21 +0000 2022

Likes

838

Retweets

240

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Harmeet K. Dhillon @pnjaban

2/This leaking by the DOJ (res ipsa loquitur) is also criminal obstruction of justice, & may be punished as such. See, e.g., United States v. Brenson, 104 F.3d 1267, 1276 (11th Cir. 1997) (internal citations omitted). This would, of course, require a less biased AG to pursue it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2022

Preceded By

Harmeet K. Dhillon @pnjaban

🧵1/The DOJ’s incessant leaks of grand jury material (Trump/MAL, Save America PAC) are not just sleazy and dishonest — they violate Fed.R.Crim.P 6(e)(2) re GJ secrecy. An aggrieved party may make a motion to the court for contempt sanctions, force gov’t to rebut prime facie case. https://t.co/GglcJp5Fxi — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2022

Followed By

Harmeet K. Dhillon @pnjaban

3/ While the aggrieved party may make a motion, the federal court itself with jurisdiction over the leaky DOJ attorneys could, sua sponte, order a hearing on contempt and injunctive relief for the obvious DOJ misconduct. Why aren’t any DC District Court judges asking questions? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2022