Sahil Kapur

@sahilkapur ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 31, 2022

Created

Tue Mar 22 20:23:57 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur

"I believe the constitution is fixed in its meaning. I believe it's appropriate to look at the original intent, original public meaning of the words." But she says "there are times" that's not enough and judges must look at history, structure and existing circumstances. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2022

Preceded By

Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur

KBJ: "I'm reluctant to establish or adopt a particular label... I'm looking at the facts in a case and my experience as a trial judge helps me to assess the facts... That's a part of judging responsibility that isn't really captured by originalism or living Constitution." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2022

Followed By

Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur

One thing this hearing captures is how much more effective the right is with language re: courts. The last GOP nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, openly embraced “originalism” and “textualism.” What’s the liberal equivalent? There doesn’t seem to be one. KBJ is resisting all labels. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2022