Sahil Kapur

@sahilkapur ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 25, 2020

Created

Mon Oct 07 20:43:44 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur

But so will every Dem's plan, even Biden/Buttigieg public option. Less disruptive than single payer, yes; still winners and losers. Including middle class losers—e.g. some private plans won't be able to compete and get canceled, causing people to lose preferred doctors/benefits. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 7, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur

There's a lot of focus on Sanders/Warren-style single payer being disruptive. And—you may think that's good or bad—it's a fact. They're the most disruptive of the 2020 pack and will create winners and losers, even in the middle class, as this piece notes: https://t.co/FXCzERQx28 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 7, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur

Much of the debate turns on whether to focus on middle class taxes (as Biden/Buttigieg want to) or overall medical costs (as Sanders/Warren want to). The former say their vision is the smoothest way to extend coverage, the latter say theirs will be better overall for pocketbooks. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 7, 2019 Hibernated