Patrick Byrne

@PatrickByrne ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 13, 2023

Created

Sun Mar 12 04:32:20 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Agreed, but note also that the "personal-liberty laws" had been undermined by the Dred Scott decision, a 7-2 decision of the Taney Court (Taney and the other 6 were all Democrats). — PolitiTweet.org

The CSA Constitution stated enslavers "shall have the right" to take enslaved people to all Confederate states and… https://t.co/ziyJqxQdF2

Posted March 12, 2023

Preceded By

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

People often get the 3/5ths clause backwards. ABOLITIONISTS were the ones saying, "Since you do not think slaves are people, you should not get to count them in a census." SLAVERS wanted them to count 5/5ths. The compromise was 3/5. — PolitiTweet.org

Like the US Constitution, the Confederates included the 3/5ths clause. It stated: “Representatives and direct taxes… https://t.co/OyPnxyAKkX

Posted March 12, 2023

Followed By

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

100% true. Claims about it being about "states' rights" are blue-smoke-and-mirror attempts to obfuscate this. So are claims that Lincoln & the North fought the Civil War for some reason other than slavery. Both sets of claims are quibbles. It was a war over slavery. — PolitiTweet.org

When someone tells you that Confederates were about “states' rights” or “southern pride,” point out that their Cons… https://t.co/BvxUrSuVWM

Posted March 12, 2023