Patrick Byrne

@PatrickByrne ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 10, 2023

Created

Tue Mar 07 15:31:17 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Mac

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

So I accept the previous point, subject to the comments I made below it. However, the argument breaks down, for even if it is indeed the case that there were formally such rights in Barbados (the main focus of his enquiry), he is wearing blinders in three ways: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2023

Preceded By

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

Liam other distinction, however, is infirm. It concerns the legal status of a chattel slave vs. an indentured servant. The indentured servant has SOME legal rights a slave lacks. They kept their names, had successful lawsuits for injury, and gave birth to free offspring. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2023

Followed By

Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne

1) He ignores the context of Cromwell in Ireland. “To hell or Connaught!” Translation: either get to that rocky infertile part of Ireland known as, “Connaught,” or be put to the sword. The English treated killing an Irish in Ireland like killing a dog. So much for legal rights. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2023