James E. Clyburn

@RepJamesClyburn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 7, 2021

Created

Thu Aug 06 16:06:20 +0000 2015

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

James E. Clyburn @RepJamesClyburn

Also, there is the idea of requiring private individuals to bring suit in district court. But we are aware of the extraordinary (40/50) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2015 Hibernated

Preceded By

James E. Clyburn @RepJamesClyburn

more importantly, when there is no compelling need to do so, the Supreme Court probably would find such extension unconstitutional. (39/50) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2015 Hibernated

Followed By

James E. Clyburn @RepJamesClyburn

time, financial impositions, & court burdens this would consume. And there is the argument that pre-clearance is burdensome, but (41/50) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2015 Hibernated