James E. Clyburn

@RepJamesClyburn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 7, 2021

Created

Thu Aug 06 16:06:07 +0000 2015

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

James E. Clyburn @RepJamesClyburn

to all 50 states, but we know this would effectively kill enforcement b/c of a lack of sufficient budget commitments, but, (38/50) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2015 Hibernated

Preceded By

James E. Clyburn @RepJamesClyburn

“The arguments for diluting the Voting Rights Act are transparently pretextual. Some say pre-clearance coverage should be extended (37/50) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2015 Hibernated

Followed By

James E. Clyburn @RepJamesClyburn

more importantly, when there is no compelling need to do so, the Supreme Court probably would find such extension unconstitutional. (39/50) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 6, 2015 Hibernated