David Frum

@davidfrum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 2, 2019

Created

Tue Apr 30 03:12:25 +0000 2019

Likes

202

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Frum @davidfrum

OTOH, if the Trump plan is just to buy time, even vexatious litigation can work. The bank subpoena upheld by the Supreme Court in 1975 was first issued in ... 1970. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 30, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

David Frum @davidfrum

Trump and his family complain that the subpoena as intrusive and politically motivated. Nerts to that. If the subpoena is premised on a valid congressional power, like overseeing banking, "The wisdom of congressional approach or methodology is not open to judicial veto." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 30, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

David Frum @davidfrum

This subpoena of Deutsche Bank may proceed faster, however. Chairs Adam Schiff & Maxine Waters have ingeniously issued their subpoena not to Trump, but to his bankers. The bank will want to comply ... and it's Trump's lawyers who must prevent the bank against its will. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 30, 2019 Hibernated