Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 20, 2022

Created

Mon May 09 17:59:38 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

@NickDegani @haroldfeld I guess what I don't understand is: If Verizon were unburdened by common carriage and thus *could* block calls as you say — but it would not be the 1A giving it the right to block calls — what right would Verizon cite instead to justify blocking the calls? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

@NickDegani @haroldfeld Totally agree the question about whether 1A gives Verizon a right to block calls (separate from common carriage) is a different question. So if you think VZ could block calls absent common carriage but the 1A would not be the source of that right, what could VZ cite instead? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

@NickDegani @haroldfeld I don't believe plaintiffs are suggesting websites have different 1A rights from phone companies, and their argument needn't go that far. They can simply argue that phone companies share the same 1A rights as websites, AND that telcos face additional statutory requirements. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022