Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 18, 2022

Created

Mon May 09 16:59:59 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

@NickDegani Sorry, meant to say "Title II" there. https://t.co/LGLR9NXTNW — PolitiTweet.org

@NickDegani By that logic, Oldham's hypothetical is off-base because Verizon's Title I obligations prevent it from… https://t.co/h740o3sS4V

Posted May 9, 2022

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

@NickDegani By that logic, Oldham's hypothetical is off-base because Verizon's Title I obligations prevent it from blocking calls. Could it block other content it doesn't like within its broadband business? I think the answer is yes, right? That's the entire NN fight in a nutshell. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

@NickDegani Why *isn't* it because of common carriage, though? But for common carrier obligations, couldn't Verizon theoretically block calls, just like how under current rules, Verizon's broadband business could legally block certain traffic? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022