Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Feb. 19, 2021

Created

Thu Jan 28 15:44:42 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

TL;DR Vindman argues that perhaps the mere capability to cause damage with a given cyber intrusion might be enough to warrant the "act of war" label. IMO this opens up a big can of worms. https://t.co/obi3gilfaa — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2021

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

Speaking of @lawfareblog, this is a really deep and nuanced piece (from a familiar name) about whether the SolarWinds thing can be described as an act of war. Highly recommended, though I think I disagree in small parts. https://t.co/leSJJL9mB1 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2021

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

Right now the informal consensus is, "if it didn't cause physical harm similar to, say, a bomb going off, then it isn't an act of war." Obviously lots of gray area in what you can define as harm. But it gets even messier when you expand that to include *potential* for harm. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2021