Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 14, 2020

Created

Fri Nov 13 14:28:19 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

But this quid pro quo is never actually contemplated in the text of Trump’s executive orders. There are two orders. One simply said that after a number of days, business dealings with TikTok will be banned. There was no mention that a deal could avert the ban. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2020

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

This has been the single biggest point of confusion with the administration’s interlocking executive orders on TikTok and Trump’s own rhetoric on the issue. Trump’s rhetoric has often linked a sale of TikTok with a ban, implying that one could result in avoiding the other. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2020

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

The second order said that TikTok must be divested by Nov. 12. There was no mention that TikTok would be banned if it didn’t meet the deadline. There are no other consequences outlined. Just that the attorney general has authority to take any steps to enforce the order. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2020