Brian Fung | @[email protected]

@b_fung ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 10, 2022

Created

Wed Jun 17 18:32:21 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

On a call with reporters today, Facebook’s Nick Clegg responded by arguing changes to 230 will chill speech: https://t.co/BjftGDOEGo — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

TL;DR DOJ wants new limits placed on how and when platforms can invoke 230. Under the proposal, the industry couldn’t claim immunity for things like user-posted terrorist content or child abuse material. Or for civil cases by federal agencies, or against antitrust complaints. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Brian Fung | @[email protected] @b_fung

A key theme in the DOJ proposal is that platforms should not be eligible for 230 immunity if they’re operating in “bad faith.” This theme — critiquing 230’s Good Samaritan provision — also appears in Sen. Hawley’s bill today and Trump’s executive order. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated