Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
Having read investigative findings, I am completely struck by fact does not appear Justices (or their families) were interviewed, much less investigated. Since bare min "preponderance of evidence" was standard that could not be met w/staff, who else does that leave as leaker? — PolitiTweet.org
The New York Times @nytimes
Breaking News: The Supreme Court announced that an internal investigation had failed to identify who leaked a draft… https://t.co/ttKl9Cvbog
