Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq
@deminimis @DjIV2010 @GreggJarrett It can be under Espionage Act. It's one of the provisions that was considered for Clinton et al but it had rarely been used in that context, poorly defined, and there was no way a precedental case was going to be brought against former Cabinet Member w/o better facts/law. — PolitiTweet.org