Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 3, 2022

Created

Thu Dec 02 15:37:37 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

Defendants already have constitutional right to testify but intent as to why they decided to Illegally release classified info is irrelevant, i.e., b/c they disagreed with policy, as it should be. "Public Interest Defense" is absolutely unworkable & will never pass. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2021

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@danielschuman Defendants already have constitutional right to testify but intent as to why they decided to Illegally release classified info is irrelevant, i.e., b/c they disagreed with policy, as it should be. "Public Interest Defense" is absolutely unworkable & will never pass. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2021 Just a Typo

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@SarkastikB Not "leak", which would be to unauthorized third parties. Disclose classified info lawfully as part of legal #whistleblower process, yes. We coordinate it all the time for clients. It was what we did for IC #WBer in impeachment case & DHS client who was most senior WBer ever. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2021