Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 30, 2021

Created

Tue Nov 30 20:31:42 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

3/In #Arrington's case, however, govt accused her of security violation but provided no meaningful details that would enable proper substantive response. I've handled hundreds of these cases over last 20+ years & rarely have I seen deficiency as bad as this one. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

2/Since 1988, fed courts decline to hear #securityclearance challenges to substantive decisions. But caselaw makes clear that agency's failure to procedurally follow own regs/laws can be pursued. Very rare agencies don't follow proper procedures so litigation usually unnecessary — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

END/Injunctions move quickly. Govt has 7 days to respond & court generally will hold hearing w/i 21 days. We already are scheduling a court appearance tomorrow to decide schedule. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021