Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 14, 2021

Created

Mon Jun 14 20:48:19 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

11/#GovTucker’s understanding was original legal analysis of 26 U.S.C. § 1374 was conducted exclusively by OIC. At evidentiary hearing in Dec 2000, he learned that at least as early as Oct 2, 2000, .... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 14, 2021

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

10/At same time appellate litigation was ongoing, separate admin process was convened by IRS at #GovTucker’s request to determine what amount of financial restitution, if any, was still owed to U.S. Government. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 14, 2021

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

12/...OIC had been informed in letter that IRS had rendered determination regarding application of § 1374 that conflicted w/law used in pursuit of prosecution. Issues were remanded to IRS & on May 23, 2002, IRS issued notice of proposed deficiency rejecting OIC’s legal analysis. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 14, 2021