Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 19, 2021

Created

Fri Mar 19 18:01:53 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@LeeHanc15772572 @LowlifeTami Actually, not true. Could it, yes. Generally, no. I often see indivs with 3-5 DWIs & can still successfully mitigate Govt concerns & save clearance. Very fact dependent. Frequency, support system, circumstances, etc. Honestly, tons of alcoholics w/clearances. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 19, 2021

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@LeeHanc15772572 @LowlifeTami We usually recommend at least one year of non-use, preferably three. NEVER if you held a clearance or served in position of trust/law enforcement at the time. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 19, 2021

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@LeeHanc15772572 Clearly federal policy would have to change, i.e., decriminalization. Can't just be ignored but still be criminal. My pet peeve is that most ppl would not know in areas where use lawful that this would be issue for security clearance. Then they get dinged. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 19, 2021