Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 10, 2021

Created

Tue Sep 15 16:05:38 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BradMossEsq @EricColumbus @steve_vladeck Which part should I fire you over? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 15, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@steve_vladeck @BradMossEsq @EricColumbus But that's not a legal argument Steve. That's a policy interpretation. One that is entirely legitimate to make, and in my view probably correct. But the current state of law allows for a criminal case. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 15, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@zachsdorfman It wasn't found to be legal. USGOVT didn't reach sufficient legal burden to justify civil injunction. Criminality was never tested. As I said, 4/9 Justices thought criminal prosecution was appropriate. "Proper" is a judgment call. I have no issue with that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 15, 2020 Hibernated