Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 10, 2021

Created

Tue Sep 15 16:01:55 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@EricColumbus @steve_vladeck @BradMossEsq Heck no. We pointed that out in our Simms 1st Amendment lawsuit. Authors who published favorable info on Trump were not pursued, while those who published info perceived as unfavorable were. But selective prosecution defenses are incredibly difficult, as I am sure you know. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 15, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

This is fine, but it was in context of Wash Post deliberately setting up legal battle. Few ppl/entities are willing to take that risk. And those that did publish Pentagon Papers are fortunate they were not prosecuted bc 4/9 Justices supported criminal prosecution. — PolitiTweet.org

"The only way to assert the right to publish is to publish." --Ben Bagdikian, arguing for the Washington Post to p… https://t.co/zbljrksCsr

Posted Sept. 15, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@steve_vladeck @BradMossEsq @EricColumbus But that's not a legal argument Steve. That's a policy interpretation. One that is entirely legitimate to make, and in my view probably correct. But the current state of law allows for a criminal case. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 15, 2020 Hibernated