Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 16, 2020

Created

Fri Aug 14 19:44:11 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

Same Judge did this to me last year. I had 22 footnotes for 38 pages of arguments. Incorporated most into main text, which made brief 1/2 page longer, and resulted in just four footnotes. At least DOJ got spanked too! 😂 https://t.co/46YOo66yKZ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

#Disgusting. But we expect no better (or is it less?) from Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

"President Donald Trump on Thursday gave credence to a false and racist conspiracy theory about Kamala Harris’ elig… https://t.co/JyKbmX7QX6

Posted Aug. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

Court's Order: MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's [24] Opposition is STRICKEN as violating the Local Rule on excessive footnotes. Plaintiff shall file an Opposition by August 14, 2019, with no more than 10 footnotes containing no more than 50 aggregate lines of text — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 14, 2020 Hibernated