Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 24, 2020

Created

Wed Jun 17 21:36:09 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen As you both know, what can be classified is incredibly broad. Ppl should read Exec Order 13526 (2009), Section 1.4, how easy it is for Govt to classify info. Things like "foreign govt information" or "foreign relations" of US, i.e., conversations w/China. https://t.co/wuhRs0Iu8m — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen That was all from Stillman v. CIA et al., 517 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 2007). Quotes were mostly from DC Cir though. Who was the Judge? #EmmetSullivan — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BradMossEsq @BoutrousTed @NormEisen I don't recall anyone having success in the Espionage Act leak cases. Presenting contradictory evidence, yes. I did that in AIPAC case. But not questioning govt classification experts/decision-makers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated