Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 22, 2020

Created

Wed Jun 17 21:32:08 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen (5) "After reviewing in camera detailed affidavits from officials at several government agencies who seek to classify this information, and after reviewing the manuscript and public source documents provided to the government by Stillman, the Court concludes that the government — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen (4) "Court will not rely on any 'presumption of regularity' if rational explanations are missing." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen ..has properly classified the twenty-three disputed passages in Stillman's manuscript. The affidavits provided by officials from the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense and Defense Intelligence Agency give the Court reason to believe that the censored portions of . — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated