Mark S. Zaid

@MarkSZaidEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 22, 2020

Created

Wed Jun 17 21:30:23 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen Let me cite language from prior case I litigated re: what is judicially recognized how to handle this aspect: (1) "government is entitled to substantial deference in its classification decisions." (2) "Court will not just rubber stamp the government's classification decision." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen That doesn't mean, however, Court might not inquire of Govt to submit classified, in-camera affidavits explaining role of Knight & Ellis et al, and ask for rational explanations detailing classification determinations. Presumably, that's months from now but timing up to Court. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Mark S. Zaid @MarkSZaidEsq

@BoutrousTed @NormEisen (3) "the Court must satisfy itself 'from the record, in camera or otherwise, that the [government agencies] in fact had good reason to classify, and therefore censor, the materials at issue.'" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2020 Hibernated